Volume I · Issue 01 · April 2026

Publication-ready systematic reviews, conducted by researchers.

Guided by you. Delivered to your journal. Structured for PRISMA 2020 from the first query to the final reference list.

Turnaround
5–10 business days
Coverage
~97% biomedical literature
Standard
PRISMA 2020 compliant
Conducted by
MDs & PhD researchers
§ 01 Process

Four stages. Nothing proceeds without your approval.

You define the question, review our search before it runs, set your own relevance threshold, and receive a manuscript-ready document. Every decision is yours.

I

You define the question

Send your study goal and PICO framework. A rough description is fine — we formalize it and return it for confirmation before running any searches.

1–2 business days
II

We build and deliver the search package

Structured Boolean queries across three complementary databases. You see every article before committing to anything.

2–3 business days
III

You confirm the scope

Review the ranked article list and choose your relevance cutoff. Higher cutoff — fewer articles, faster turnaround. Lower cutoff — more comprehensive.

Your timeline
IV

We deliver the systematic review

A complete, manuscript-ready systematic review document (.docx) structured per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with flow diagram, synthesis, and Vancouver references.

5–10 business days
§ 02 Methodology

Three databases. Approximately 97% of published biomedical literature.

The threshold recognized by evidence synthesis guidelines as sufficient for a comprehensive, publication-quality systematic review.

Primary source

MEDLINE / PubMed

The global standard for biomedical and clinical literature. MeSH indexing, full Boolean support, authoritative citation metadata.

35M+ records
Coverage expansion

OpenAlex

An open academic graph covering journals not indexed by PubMed, including non-English biomedical publications and preprints.

260M+ works
Unpublished trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

The US registry of clinical trials, capturing ongoing studies and unpublished trial results — essential for publication bias assessment.

470k+ studies
§ 03 Deliverables

What arrives in your inbox.

A complete package, formatted for direct journal submission. Every document is reproducible — you receive the queries, the databases, and the dates.

  1. iSystematic review document (.docx)Manuscript
  2. iiPRISMA 2020 flow diagramFigure
  3. iiiStudy characteristics tableTable
  4. ivFull synthesis across nine evidence domainsAnalysis
  5. vRisk of bias signals per articleAppendix
  6. viVancouver-format reference listReferences
  7. viiAll database queries used (reproducible)Protocol

Six to eighteen months of manual work, delivered in five to ten business days.

Conducted by qualified researchers · Guided by you · Delivered to your journal
§ 04 Reviewers

Every review is conducted by a qualified human.

With domain expertise in biomedical or clinical science, and formal training in systematic review methodology.

Medical Doctors & Clinicians

Active research experience with familiarity in clinical study design, outcome measurement, and evidence-based practice.

PhD Researchers & Postdocs

Trained in systematic review methodology, biostatistics, and scientific writing for peer-reviewed publication.

Advanced Graduate Students

Supervised by senior reviewers and rigorously trained in PRISMA standards and critical literature appraisal.

§ 05 Timeline

A typical review, stage by stage.

Figure 1 — Review timeline, by stage
StageTypical duration
Stage I — PICO confirmation1–2 business days
Stage II — Search package delivery2–3 business days
Stage III — Scope confirmationClient timeline
Stage IV — Full review delivery5–10 business days after confirmation
Total, typical engagementThree weeks, door to door
Commission a review

Describe your study. We will respond within one business day.

Tell us your research question, target journal, and any scope requirements. We will return a formalized PICO extraction and a preliminary search strategy for your approval.